Never Say Never Again

Not ever

Not once

On no occasion

At no time…

Never. Never in the wildest dreams of my “possible self” did I imagine me as a school principal. Though I felt the time was right to begin the transition into a more focused leadership role, I was quite content to take the safe route of program administrator with an eye towards Curriculum Director. This seemed safe, doable and not too “messy”; I never imagined I had the skill-set to deal with contentious staff and disgruntled parents, always quipping “You couldn’t pay me enough to be a principal”. My impression was that Administration was largely made up of problems, roadblocks and paperwork; where’s the joy in that? Indeed, Coyle (2011) paints a rather dire picture of the role of principal as someone entirely out-of-touch with education, more Office Space  cubicle denizen than educator: “If class sizes increase, if students have varying learning styles and critical emotional or academic needs, if there are insufficient or outdated texts, administrators have little hands on connection with that reality. Their work remains quite separate from the work of the classroom” (p. 44). You see, my impression of administration was based on a narrow and wholly unimaginative misconception of what it can mean to be a principal, at least for people like Coyle. For me, the reality is much different than I could have possibly conceived. To my astonishment, I am finding a rapidly growing appreciation for the administrative portion of my internship, an experience that completely refutes Coyle’s imagining of principals as outdated, middle managers feeding on the bloat of a top-heavy system.

“Strong positive cultures are places with a shared sense of what is important, a shared ethos of caring and concern, and a shared commitment to helping students learn” (Kent & Deal, 2011, p. 50).

So what do principals do? As in everything in life, it depends on your point of view. From my experience, school principals play a defining role in shaping the curricular focus and culture of a school; for better or worse, whether an effective or ineffective leader, the principal is the final voice in the direction of a school. Kent and Deal (2011) speak to the importance that leaders play in school climate: “School leaders do several important things when sculpting culture”:

  • They read the culture
  • They uncover and articulate core values
  • They work to fashion a positive context (p. 51).

Much of the work I have been engaged with these first weeks of school is helping to refashion the academic and professional culture at our new school. I am playing a part in taking our school from a culture of weak academics to academic excellence; from a culture where teachers shut their door and just try to survive to a culture of collegiality and collaboration. First, understanding the unique culture and climate of a school is essential before sustainable, positive change can be made. I learn something new every day about the culture of our school through parent and student interaction; I learn which parents are supportive of our change in focus and which need a little more convincing that we are headed in a direction that will ultimately benefit their child. Returning staff is a rich source of information about the historic context of our school in everything from prior decision-making to parent and student expectations; they warn us about potential land mines and have played a big role in communicating their support to staff that have been less responsive. In reality, the learning curve is steep but it is important work as we reiterate the message that every decision is based on what is best for the kids.

Indeed, a big part of my internship has been creating the structures and climate necessary for student success: creating a curricular program that enhances academic rigor so graduating seniors can get into college; sitting in discipline meetings to ensure that accusations of bullying are dealt with, followed by a meeting with the victim’s father; sitting in on an admissions meeting with a parent to clearly communicate guidelines and expectations for the conditional acceptance of their English Language Learner (ELL) students. My role in these meetings has been as an observer but I am gaining valuable insight and experience into setting the tone and direction of potentially difficult meetings, listening to concerns while redirecting conversation back to the issue at hand.

I have also played an active role in crafting a teaching schedule that supports common planning within content areas to work on the vertical and horizontal alignment of curriculum. This is an example of a scheduled, 90 minute weekly curriculum meting for two of our mathematics teachers:

Example of 90 minute common planning block

Example of 90 minute common planning block

Providing time for teachers to meet for collaborative, reflective discussion, create cross-content curricular units, craft common assessments and talk about students and teaching in a dedicated block squarely places our school’s emphasis on teaching and learning; it also helps support fellow teachers in building their leadership capacity. “Structuring time to work together is pivotal because it provides time for collaborative reflection and decision making, both essential components of leadership” (Coyle, 2011, p. 44). As I watch the HOS invite teachers into the decision-making process through the creation of Primary and Upper School Liaisons’; creating year-long and short term committees to work on the teaching, learning, safety and staff well-being; and having an open door policy where students, parents and staff are welcome to air their concerns and needs, I am keenly aware of the professional modeling that is happening, and I am taking note. Coyle (2011) laments that “The central dilemma in school improvement is restructuring in a way that keeps people involved and invested in the core work of the school, teaching, yet free to collaborate and lead” (p. 47) however, I wonderful if this is an issue that is more endemic in US schools rather than international schools? We are purposely structuring a professional environment that supports teaching and learning as our core values.

Though they do not believe a key leader is essential, Heller and Firestone (2011) discuss the following six functions as essential leadership tasks:

  1. Providing and selling a vision of the change
  2. Obtaining resources
  3. Providing encouragement and recognition
  4. Adapting standard operating procedures
  5. Monitoring the improvement effort
  6. Handling disturbances (pp. 62-64)

As stated in the first function providing and selling a vision of the change, I feel that it is important to continually refer back to the source of our shared vision for the school, the most recent Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC) reaccreditation report as the underlying foundation for decision-making. It is important to gain buy-in and remind staff of the critical work we are engaged in this year to address areas for improvement in the report. This is an example of the Meeting Protocols I am working on with the specific WASC report verbiage deleted for anonymity. The meeting schedule and protocols will be introduced at our staff meeting this Tuesday:

Curriculum Meeting Protocols- draft

Curriculum Meeting Protocols- draft

Teachers who aspire to leadership at the principal level need encouragement to start thinking like an administrator” (Searby & Shaddix, 2011, p. 58).

MP900341522In the end, I have to disagree with Coyle (2011) and others that believe a strong administrative leader is not important to leading the work that must be done in schools; I know from first-hand experience working in schools in the US and abroad that leadership is key. I’ve seen the wreckage first-hand that comes from ineffective administrators (Principal or HOS), where teachers hunker down and just try to survive without the energy or time to lead out of the chaos. Teachers play a complementary and crucial role in working in tandem with the Principal and other administrative leadership to bring the teaching and learning to its fullest fruition; but teachers cannot do it on their own. Teachers need strong leadership and they need effective Principals.

I have come to appreciate the intellectual challenge inherent in observing, analyzing and suggesting strategies to move the many academic and school culture changes we’re initiating this year forward. I find that sitting in on meetings with parents and students, even when tears are shed and anger and frustration is expressed, enlightening. I am excited to attend my second Board meeting Wednesday evening even though there will be tough questions to answer as we communicate the hard work that must be done this year to move forward, to remedy the leadership vacuum of the past. My awareness and imagination surrounding the positive and far-reaching impact that a school principal can have on the teaching and learning that happens in a school has expanded exponentially. Every day, every experience and leadership opportunity that I add to my repertoire builds a possible self that rather than saying “never” thinks someday.


Coyle, Monica. 2011. Teacher Leadership vs. School Management: flatten the hierarchies. In Eleanor Blair Hilty (Ed.).  Teacher Leadership: The “New” Foundations of Teacher Education. A Reader. (pp. 44-48). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Heller, Marjorie F. & Firestone, William A. 2011. Heroes, Teams, and Teachers: A Study of Leadership for Change. In Eleanor Blair Hilty (Ed.). Teacher Leadership: The “New” Foundations of Teacher Education. A Reader (pp. 61-82). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Peterson Kent D. & Deal, Terrence E. 2011. How Leaders Influence the Culture of Schools. In Eleanor Blair Hilty (Ed.) Teacher Leadership: The “New” Foundations of Teacher Education. A Reader (pp. 49-52). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Searby, Linda & Shaddix, Lisa. 2011. Growing Teacher Leaders in a Culture of Excellence. In Eleanor Blair Hilty (Ed.) Teacher Leadership: The “New” Foundations of Teacher Education. A Reader (pp. 53-60). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.


One thought on “Never Say Never Again

  1. Pingback: Standard 1 and Standard 3 Meta-reflection: Instructional Planning & Curriculum [Leadership in Applied Curriculum: Independent Study] | Kim Rayl's bportfolio

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s